LawBlog

Blog Archive

  • ▼  2007 (32)
    • ►  September (1)
    • ►  July (5)
    • ►  June (10)
    • ▼  May (16)
      • O'Connor: Members of Court May Change - Precedent...
      • Death Penalty Opponents Decry Ohio Execution
      • Coke Employees Get 'The Real Thing': Prison Sente...
      • Issue for the Supreme Court: Does Capital Punishme...
      • Are Psychic Readings Protected by the 1st Amendment?
      • High Court: Parents May Represent Themselves in Fe...
      • Mass. Court: Gay Marriages by New Yorkers Prior t...
      • "That's so gay" student lawsuit is dismissed
      • Efforts to Limit Medical Malpractice Awards Stall ...
      • Divorce rates decline = Stronger marriages in U.S.?
      • Deceased Sperm Donor Ordered to Pay Child Support
      • Racy "Life's Short, Get a Divorce" Law Firm Billbo...
      • Philip Workman Becomes 3rd Person Executed in Tenn...
      • Law seeks to permit guns in parks . . . good idea ...
      • Ouch . . . Here's a lawsuit by a Met's fan who say...
      • Welcome to the RSCC Law Blog

About Me

bloglawyer
View my complete profile

Friday, May 25, 2007

Death Penalty Opponents Decry Ohio Execution

The ACLU and other groups are asking for a moratorium on executions in Ohio after State officials took just under two hours to execute a condemned prisoner. Officials needed ten tries to locate a vein that could be used to administer the lethal injection.

Is this just cause to institute a moratorium? Why or why not?

Full article
Posted by bloglawyer at 9:42 AM

No comments:

Post a Comment

Newer Post Older Post Home
Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)